Who Says Math Has to Be Boring?

The New York Times

American students are bored by math, science and engineering. They buy smartphones and tablets by the millions but don’t pursue the skills necessary to build them. Engineers and physicists are often portrayed as clueless geeks on television, and despite the high pay and the importance of such jobs to the country’s future, the vast majority of high school graduates don’t want to go after them.

Nearly 90 percent of high school graduates say they’re not interested in a career or a college major involving science, technology, engineering or math, known collectively as STEM, according to a survey of more than a million students who take the ACT test. The number of students who want to pursue engineering or computer science jobs is actually falling, precipitously, at just the moment when the need for those workers is soaring. (Within five years, there will be 2.4 million STEM job openings.)

One of the biggest reasons for that lack of interest is that students have been turned off to the subjects as they move from kindergarten to high school. Many are being taught by teachers who have no particular expertise in the subjects. They are following outdated curriculums and textbooks. They become convinced they’re “no good at math,” that math and science are only for nerds, and fall behind.

That’s because the American system of teaching these subjects is broken. For all the reform campaigns over the years, most schools continue to teach math and science in an off-putting way that appeals only to the most fervent students. The mathematical sequence has changed little since the Sputnik era: arithmetic, pre-algebra, algebra, geometry, trigonometry and, for only 17 percent of students, calculus. Science is generally limited to the familiar trinity of biology, chemistry, physics and, occasionally, earth science.

Read the full article here.

Recent News

Stanford Social Innovation Review
What separates an investment that solves today’s problem from one that continues creating value decades from now? In their latest article for the Stanford Social Innovation Review, Beyond100K Executive Director Talia Milgrom-Elcott and Starfish Institute Managing Director Justin D’Angona examine a question at the heart of systems change: How do we design philanthropy to outlast the people who fund it?
2025 Beyond100K Annual Report
Explore Beyond100K’s 2025 Annual Report and discover how a growing network of partners is turning collaboration into lasting progress toward ending the STEM teacher shortage.
A STEM teacher shortage became something bigger: a lesson in systems change. In this new story from the World Economic Forum, Beyond100K reflects on what it takes to build the networks, infrastructure, and collective imagination needed to transform education at scale.