State Mandates As Political Cover

State Mandates As Political Cover. Today we’ll head straight to reader responses to Tuesday’s newsletter because they were so good and so important to ed reform writ large. This is exactly the kind of conversation I was hoping SCHOOLED would spur.

After praising phone bans, I asked:

Are phones so terrible that, like cigarettes, they should be treated as contraband in our schools? And prohibited at the state level? Is that also how you would treat, say, balanced literacy and three-queuing? What is the defining principle we should embrace so that we don’t try to micromanage everything from the state level but also encourage (or even require) schools to adopt evidence-based practices?

And boy did you have opinions!

Most tellingly, several respondents hit on the same theme: that local leaders often need the political cover of state mandates (or bans) in order to do the right thing.

Read the full post here.

Recent News

Beyond100K Trends and Predictions That Are Defining STEM in 2026
The 2026 Beyond100K Trends Report highlights four shifts shaping the STEM teacher workforce, drawing on insights and innovations from partners across the Beyond100K network.
Brookings
Brookings’ analysis of the STEM teacher workforce highlights Beyond100K’s network-driven efforts as a national force strengthening the STEM teacher pipeline in high-need communities.
In her reflection from Davos 2026, Talia Milgrom-Elcott uncovers three overlooked signals shaping global cooperation, inclusion, and human-centered AI that the headlines missed.